Use one real moment, one Work Language, and one small agreement to replace guesswork with support your team member can actually feel.
Before the one-on-one · 2 minutes
Prepare in two minutes.
Choose a moment. Write down one moment when their energy changed: they leaned in, withdrew, pushed back, or went quiet.
Separate fact from story. “They stopped volunteering ideas” is an observation. “They do not care” is a guess.
Pick a starting lens. Scan the signals below and choose one Work Language to explore—not to diagnose.
During the one-on-one · 8 minutes
Run the conversation.
1 minute — name what you noticed. “I noticed you had lots of energy during planning, then got quieter once the handoffs changed. I may be reading that wrong—what was happening for you?”
5 minutes — choose one opening question. Stay with their answer. Use the follow-up only when it helps them get more specific.
2 minutes — make one testable agreement. Do not promise a personality-perfect workplace. Choose one change you can both observe.
01
Recognition
Signals you may notice
Good work disappears into the next task
They ask whether their contribution was noticed
Open with
“Which part of your work lately are you proudest of—and what made it matter to you?”
Then ask: “When appreciation lands well for you, what does it sound or look like?”
Weak response
“You know we appreciate you.”
Useful response
“I missed naming your role in the client recovery. I’ll call out the specific contribution in Friday’s review.”
02
Reward
Signals you may notice
Extra effort feels assumed rather than exchanged
Promises about pay, time, or opportunity stay vague
Open with
“Where does the return for your effort feel clear—and where does it feel out of balance?”
Then ask: “What fair, realistic acknowledgment would match the contribution?”
Weak response
“Money isn’t everything.”
Useful response
“I can’t change salary today. I can clarify the promotion criteria by Tuesday and protect Friday afternoon after this push.”
03
Growth
Signals you may notice
Capable work has become repetitive
Feedback describes results but not development
Open with
“What do you want to be better at three months from now?”
Then ask: “What stretch would feel energising without setting you up to fail?”
Weak response
“Just keep doing great work and opportunities will come.”
Useful response
“You’ll lead the next discovery call. We’ll rehearse Thursday, and I’ll give feedback on two skills you chose.”
04
Stability
Signals you may notice
Priorities change without a clear reason
They spend energy checking what is still true
Open with
“What feels uncertain or changeable enough that it is getting in the way of your work?”
Then ask: “Which expectation or decision would be most useful to make explicit?”
Weak response
“Don’t worry—we’ll figure it out.”
Useful response
“The deadline is fixed; the scope is not. I’ll post the three must-have outcomes today and flag any change directly.”
05
Autonomy
Signals you may notice
Routine decisions wait for approval
Check-ins feel like surveillance rather than support
Open with
“Where would more room to decide help you do stronger work?”
Then ask: “What boundary or checkpoint would let us both feel confident?”
Weak response
“I’m just trying to make sure it’s done right.”
Useful response
“You own the approach and vendor choice within this budget. Bring me in only if the date or customer promise changes.”
06
Connection
Signals you may notice
Work has become a queue of isolated tasks
Tension or silence is weakening trust
Open with
“When have you felt most part of this team—and what is missing from that now?”
Then ask: “Which relationship, ritual, or shared goal would make the work feel less isolated?”
Weak response
“We’re all busy; don’t take it personally.”
Useful response
“I’ll pair you with Maya on the handoff and add ten minutes to Monday planning so the team can reconnect the tasks to the customer outcome.”
Mixed and competing needs
When two needs pull in different directions.
Do not choose a winner too quickly. Name both needs and design a boundary that respects each one.
Autonomy + Stability
“You want room to choose the approach, and you also want fewer surprise changes. Let’s fix the outcome and deadline, leave the method with you, and use Wednesday as our change checkpoint.”
Recognition + Connection: ask whether appreciation should be private, public, individual, or shared with the team.
Growth + Stability: create a stretch assignment with explicit guardrails, support, and a reversible first step.
Reward + Autonomy: agree on the outcome and fair return, then give latitude over how it is achieved.
Close the loop · 2 minutes
Write the agreement down.
Say it back before the conversation ends. Copy this into your one-on-one notes:
I heard that…________________________________
We will try…________________________________
We will know it helped when…_____________________
We will revisit this on…__________________________
At the next check-in, ask: “What felt different? What still needs adjusting?” Keep, change, or stop the experiment together.
The Work Languages are prompts for curiosity, not fixed labels. Believe the person’s account over your guess about their type.
Private conversation handoff
Turn your reflection into one small experiment.
Start with curiosity about what is happening now. This is not a diagnosis or a fixed type—for you or anyone else.
Private by default. These notes stay in this browser tab. They are not submitted, added to analytics, or sent to an external service.